Comparative Effects of Different Levels of Kolgrace Organic Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield Attributes of Greengram (Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek) in the Screenhouse

Main Article Content

P. N. Ihejiofor
U. N. Ukwu
G. O. Adeoye


Aim: To investigate growth and yield response of greengram to different levels of Kolgrace organic fertilizer with a view to determining the most favorable application rate for greengram production.

Study Design: Completely randomized design (CRD) with treatments replicated five (5) times.

Place and Duration of Study: Screenhouse of the Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, between July to November 2016.

Methodology: Six levels of kolgrace organic fertilizer were used (0.00, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00 and 8.00 t ha-1). Top soil (0 -15 cm) was collected from the Teaching and Research Farm of the Department of Agronomy, and leached of nutrients by soaking and washing in water for 24 hours. 2 kg of air-dry soil was mixed with the appropriate fertilizer rate and filled in each pot. 3 seeds were sown per pot and thinned to 1 seed at 2 weeks after sowing (WAS). Chemical analysis of air-dry soil sample and Kolgrace fertilizer were done at the soil chemistry laboratory of the Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, to ascertain their elemental composition. Soil particle size distribution [1], Soil pH [2], exchangeable K and Na [3], exchangeable Mg and Ca [4], exchangeable acidity [5], organic matter and organic carbon [6], available P [7], Nitrogen [8] and micronutrients (Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn) [4] were determined.

Results: Application rates were significant (p<0.05) for all the traits measured. 0.5 t ha-1 was significantly higher in plant height (39.5), number of pods (7.0) and dry pod weight (4.98). Application rate of 1 t ha-1 was higher in number of leaves (18.0) although was comparable to application rate of 0.5 t ha-1.

Conclusion: Application rate of 0.5 t ha-1 was best for three of the five traits measured and is hereby recommended.

Mungbean, environmental conservation, alternative source of protein, fertilizer requirement per kg of soil, organic fertilizer, sustainable agriculture.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ihejiofor, P. N., Ukwu, U. N., & Adeoye, G. O. (2020). Comparative Effects of Different Levels of Kolgrace Organic Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield Attributes of Greengram (Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek) in the Screenhouse. Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 6(3), 1-7.
Original Research Article


Bouyoucos GJ. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science. 1936;4: 225-228.

Black CA. Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI; 1973.

Meloche VW. Flame photometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1956;28(12):1844-1847.


Thomas GW. Exchangeable cations. In A.L. Page et al. (eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. 1982;159-165.

Logan KAB, Floate MJS, Ironside AD. Determination of exchangeable acidity and exchangeable aluminum in hill soils: Part II. Exchangeable aluminum. Communi-cations in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 1985;16:309-314.

Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science. 1934;37:29–38.

DOI: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science. 1945;59:39-45.

Kirk PL. Kjeldahl method for total nitrogen. analytical chemistry. 1950;22(2):354– 358.


USDA, NRCS. The plants Database, 6 March 2006. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874; 2006.


Shyamalee HAPA, Chandika JKJ, Suranjika PAP. Morphological variation and characterization of local mungbean germplasm. Sri Lanka Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2016;2(2):19-27.

AVRDC. Mung Bean. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center - The World Vegetation Center; 2012.

Gangaiah B. Agronomy of Kharif crops. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. 2012;110-012.

Heuzé V, Tran G, Bastianelli D, Lebas F. Mung bean (Vigna radiata). Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO; 2015.


Kaul AK. Pulses in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Farmgate Dhaka, Bangladesh. 1982;27.

Anjum NA, Umar S, Iqbal M, Khan NA. Cadmium causes oxidative stress in mungbean by affecting the antioxidant enzyme system and ascorbate glutathione cycle metabolism. Russian J Plant Physiol. 2011;58:92-99.

de Silva SS, Gunasekera RM. Effect of dietary protein level and amount of plant ingredient (Phaseolus aureus) incorporated into the diets on consumption, growth performance and carcass composition in Oreochromis niloticus (L.) fry. Aquaculture. 1989;80(1–2):121-133.

Eusebio PS, Coloso RM. Nutritional evaluation of various plant protein sources in diets for Asian sea bass (Lates calcarifer). J. Appl. Ichth. 2000;16(2):56-60.

Creswell DC. Nutritional evaluation of mung beans (Phaseolus aureus) for young broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 1981;6(8): 1905-1909

Pursglove JW. Tropical crops. Longman, London. Quarles, W., and Grossman, J. 2002. Insectary plants, intercropping and biological control. IPM Practitioner 2003;24:1-11.

Mandal S, Mandal M, Das A. Stimulation of indoleacetic acid production in a rhizobium isolate of Vigna mungo by root nodule phenolic acids. Arch Microbiol. 2009;191: 389-393

Kannaiyan S. Bio-resource technology for sustainable agriculture. Associated Publishing Company. New Delhi. 1999; 422.

Ogunwale JA, Olaniyan JO, Auloju MO. Morphological, physiochemical and clay mineralogical properties of soils overlaying basement complex rocks in Ilorin East, Nigeria. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research. 2002;32:147-154.

Naeem M, Iqbal J, Bakhsh MAA. Comparative study of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures on yield and yield components of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). J Agric Soc Sci. 2006;2(4):227-229.

Dauda SN, Ajayi FA, Ndor E. (Growth and yield of water melon (Citrullus lanatus) as affected by poultry manure application. J Agric Soc Sci. 2008;4:121-124

Suresh KD, Sneh G, Krishn KK, Mool CM. Microbial biomass carbon and microbial activities of soils receiving chemical fertilizers and organic amendments. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2004; 50:641-647.

Nottidge DO, Ojeniyi SO, Asawalem DO. Comparative effect of plant residues and NPK fertilizers on nutrient status and yield of maize Zea mays L. in humid uttisol. Soil Sci. Soc. 2005;15:9-13.

Ajoku MC, Ngwuta AA, Okoli NA. Response of mungbean genotypes to organic and inorganic fertilizers in Owerri, Southeastern Nigeria. Proceedings of the 6th National Conference of the Crop Science Society of Nigeria, Owerri. 2019; 581-592

Foth HD. Fundamentals of soil science, 8th edition, Wiley and Sons Publishers. 1990; 32.

Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD, Havlin JL. Soil fertility and fertilizers. 5th edition. Prentice- Hall of India; 2003.

Yadav A, Malik RK, Singh S. Performance of weed control treatment in mungbean under different sowing methods. Indian J. Weed Sci. 2005;37(3 & 4):273-274.

Abbas G, Abbas Z, Aslam M, Malik AU, Ishaque F, Hussain, F. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) yield under arid climate. Internat. Res. J. Plant Sci. 2011;2(4):94-98.

Mahabub SK, Khan SH, Mazed HEM, Sarker S, Hassan MdT. Effect of cow manure on growth, yield and nutrient content of mungbean. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture. 2016;2(1):1-6.

[Article no.ARJA.29297]

Rachie KO, Roberts LM. Grain legumes for the lowland tropics. Advances in Agronomy. 1974;26:1-132.

Lawn RJ, Russell JS. Mungbeans: A grain legume for summer rainfall cropping areas of Australia. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science. 1978;44: 28-41.

Lawn RJ, Ahn CS. Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek/Vigna rnungo (L.) Hepper). In. 'Grain Legume Crops.' (Eds R.J. Summerfield and E.H. Roberts). 1985; 584-623. (Collins: London).